The construction of the laptop feels and looks solid, the screen does not creak when you open it although there is a fair bit of resistance and two hands are required to open the lid. The high res screen Great performance Reasonable weight Good battery life Good looks and solid construction Packed full of features Bad: All pictures were taken with a Canon Powershot pro1, edited with Photoshop7 and resized with the Windows XP image resizer powertoy. Otherwise everything else is great. There is a nice amount of room behind the keyboard which provides a comfortable palm rest. It just refused to read some CDs.
|Date Added:||26 January 2013|
|File Size:||70.10 Mb|
|Operating Systems:||Windows NT/2000/XP/2003/2003/7/8/10 MacOS 10/X|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
The main reasons for my choice were that it was available in store, which meant that I could play with it before I purchased, came with a 2yr international warranty, a great screen, reasonable weight 2.
ASUS MNe – описание, характеристики, тест, отзывы, цены, фото
Dirt does seem to get trapped around the edges a bit which is m6800n disappointing, I guess that is why the touch pad on the W1N is being touted so much. I used the default settings for all tests. As for its burning performance, it does a full DVD- disc a 4X speed in around ssus, which is pretty good. Thus I was looking for a high res widescreen notebook, that was around or less than 3kg, had greater than 3hr battery life, and had a decent GPU.
Visit our network of sites: Otherwise everything else is great.
It would be really useful if one was on the right hand side for a mouse, especially considering the mouse included has a short lead that barely reaches from the ports to the right hand side. There is a mini firewire port on the back left which is a nice inclusion but it would be good if it was a full sized port, and I would prefer this on the back.
The screen is just brilliant.
M6800me are the specs on the Asus M6Ne that I purchased: I am going to let the following benchmarks speak for the specific performance of this machine.
Having said that the temp runs at around C most of the time, the fan rarely kicks in and is very quiet, especially compared to my old desktop.
Asus MNe Battery & Adapter
There are 4 speakers two at the front, and two at the bottom of the screen. But I will say that I am very happy with the performance, in general it is faster than my old desktop in running applications and games. The construction of the laptop feels and looks solid, the screen does not creak when you open it although there is a fair bit of resistance and two hands are required to open the lid. All content posted on TechnologyGuide is granted to TechnologyGuide with electronic publishing rights in perpetuity, as all content posted on this site becomes a part of the community.
ASUS M6800N, M6800Na, M6800Ne Series Notebook & Laptop
It just refused to read some CDs. Photoshop, Dreamweaver, and Flash will be also be used.
The high res m6800ne Great performance Reasonable weight Good battery life Good looks and solid construction Packed full of features Bad: Also the CD control buttons on the left side would be much better on the front. The weight is around 2. Sound There are 4 speakers two at the front, and two at the bottom of the screen. Performance I am going to let the following benchmarks m6800ne for the specific performance of this machine.
Asus M6000N Series M6Ne Laptop Review (pics, specs)
But I can say that I get 3. There is a nice amount of room behind the keyboard which provides a comfortable m680ne rest. I have not had any such problems with reading these same CDs in the notebook burner. All pictures were taken ashs a Canon Powershot pro1, edited with Photoshop7 and resized with the Windows XP image resizer powertoy.
The GPU was not over clocked with the default settings of for the core and for the memory. The spectacular desktop images shown are of paintings by my wife VR Morrison A shameless plug Click on pics to enlarge.
On the upside the soundcard is not to bad at all, it sounds as good as my old Soundblaster 5. For the benchmarks I used BenchemAll v2.